Chris Beneke
Among the gems in the latest
issue of Historically Speaking is
Randall Stephens’ interview
(yes, we shamelessly shill for one another on this blog) with Brandeis
University historian Maura Jane Farrelly.
Farrelly’s book Papist Patriots: The Making of an American
Catholic Identity was published earlier this year with Oxford
University Press. She focuses on colonial Maryland, which was home to British
America’s largest concentration of Roman Catholics, including the influential
Carroll family.
Anti-Catholicism in early Maryland was a complex
phenomenon, Farrelly notes, not easily reducible to hostility toward Roman
Catholics. Papist Patriots shows how
a dual Roman Catholic identity -- distinguished by its compatibility with
broader American understandings of religious liberty and its commitment to a
hierarchal and communal church -- were reconciled in this largely Protestant country.
Excerpted below are a few tidbits from Stephens’
interview with Farrelly.
On her historical
dissent from the Roman Catholic priest and theologian John Courtney Murray’s pivotal
postwar argument that “there was a natural fit between Catholicism and a
commitment to individual rights and religious pluralism”:
Farrelly: I agree with him that the Catholics
living in the British colonies in the 1770s had embraced the American consensus,
but I’m not sure their natural-law mindset was the reason why. I think it was
their unique experiences as a politically -- but not economically -- oppressed
minority in an English colony where Catholicism had been tolerated -- and then
wasn’t that ‘prepared’ colonial Catholics to accept the ideology of the
founding.
On the dual
challenge faced by early Catholics:
Some Catholics rebelled more strongly against
their government; others rebelled more strongly against their church. But most
pushed against both with equal weight, telling their king that he could not
have dominion over their religious consciences and telling their church that it
could not determine their civil loyalties or behavior.
On the
similarities between seventeenth-century Maryland and twenty first-century
Iraq:
In 2006 nearly 235,000 people in Iraq fled their
homes because of sectarian fighting. As staggering and disturbing as that
statistic is, it still represents less than 1% of the entire Iraqi population.
In contrast, 80% of the settlers in St. Mary’s County either fled or were
killed in what is known as the ‘Ingle-Claiborne Rebellion’ of 1645-46.
On the
formation of an American Catholic identity:
. . . Maryland’s Catholics understood after 1689 that
English identity alone was not going to provide them with the liberty they
sought. To claim the rights of Englishmen, they were going to have to assume
the mantle not of English identity, but ‘Marylandian” identity, since religious
toleration had been a fundamental component of Maryland’s founding. In 1776
that is precisely what they did.
Farrelly isn’t the first historian to offer an
explanation of how early Roman Catholics became Americans (or more properly, first Marylanders, and then Americans), but she may have just
provided us with the most persuasive one.
1 comment:
Nice Article! Thanks for sharing with us. Buddhist Tour India
Post a Comment