Friday, June 17, 2011

A Day in the Life: Art and History

Heather Cox Richardson

Everyone knows the iconic image of John, Paul, George, and Ringo from the cover of Abbey Road. That image launched deep investigations into its hidden meanings—“Paul is Dead,” anyone?—and into the stories it might be telling about the Beatles.

There was a story behind the image, too, and it’s one in which art and history intersect. As with any photo shoot, at the August 1969 session with the Beatles, the photographer Iain Macmillan took a number of different shots. They swept in bystanders, cars, different expressions on the musicians’ faces, different interactions.

What can these photos tell us about history?

I wonder, not only because it’s Friday, but because of another treasure trove of images recently discovered in Chicago. Vivian Maier was an emigrant from France in the 1930s and worked as a child in a New York sweatshop. When she was older, she worked as a nanny in Chicago. She had few friends, apparently, and interacted with the world largely through her camera. She left her photos, largely unseen, in a storage locker in Chicago, which put them up for sale when her payments became overdue after her death. John Maloof, writing an Images of America book about a Chicago neighborhood, bought them.

What he found was, to my mind, incredible. These are simply stunning pieces of art, chronicling the world of the streets in Chicago, primarily, as well as New York and distant countries. Her use of line, light, and texture is extraordinary.

Her photos are works of art, but they are also unusual snapshots of life in the mid-twentieth century. What can they tell us about the world in her era?

The historical reading of photographs intended to tell a societal story is straightforward compared to reading the Abbey Road photos or the Vivian Maier collection. Jacob Riis was making a point about urban poverty; Nick Ut was making a point about the Vietnam War with his 1972 image of Kim Phuc. A recent article honoring the late Tim Hetherington suggested that the key to successful war photography was an understanding of the complexity of the conflict and the ability to capture images encapsulating that story.

Artists, of course, have a different imperative. Their stories are not, necessarily, driven by current societal concerns. But if art historians can use paintings to interpret the world in which the images were made, shouldn’t historians be able to use artistic photography to interpret the modern world? And if so, how?

What can the Abbey Road photos tell us about their era?


Randall said...

Great post! You inspired me to pull out some Beatles LPs to play while I install some new blinds.

I'm teaching a course on Rock History in the fall. I might like to use a rock photo journalist's work to ask students some questions about recent history.

hcr said...

What's that great quotation about Rolling Stone? Something like: "Stories about people who can't speak, for people who can't read, by people who can't write...." (Although that's unfair on all counts, of course.) Glad to hear you're teaching Rock History.

Elizabeth said...

Excellent post! You've touched on a salient point in social history - how we can justify using works of art (of any kind) in examining the past. This is one thread I may incorporate in my thesis (social history of the telephone): how telephony was (re)presented in artwork. I have a long way to go yet on this!

Totally irrelevant, but I also use Beatles songs to teach English (as a foreign language) to 6th graders. The fact that they are too young to know who the Fab Four were means they can appreciate their music without any preconceptions or associated historical baggage. They simply love the songs for what they are.

hcr said...

Great topic for a thesis, Elizabeth! When I think of early images of telephones, I think first of Thurber's wonderful description of telephones coming to his small town, then the telephone lady in The Russians Are Coming, then the use of telephone exchanges in Rex Stout's Nero Wolfe stories. Telephone portrayed as an extension of ludicrous female gossip networks; telephone as accessory to crime/detective work.

There's so much you can do with this topic! And it's so much fun....

Randall said...

To bridge the two . . .

The Beatles song "No Reply" has this lyric:

"I tried to telephone
They said you were not home
That's a lie
Cos I know where you've been
I saw you walk in your door"

I like that Brit English makes "telephone" into a verb . . . and I think this is a terrific album, that seems better with every year that goes by. The Beatles became slightly dark, slightly depressing.

Elizabeth said...



Many thanks for your memories/ideas!

Yes, the Beatles do become more 'serious' with time, but remember that their fans too are becoming older!!

hcr said...


I'm reading Puck on Google Books, and if you go to GB and search for Puck, then click on vol. 1-2, on p. 34 there's a huge image of telephones that were being used for a concert or something, described earlier on in that issue. Didn't read it, but it's all very tongue-in-cheek, as Puck was.

I'm afraid you've got me looking for telephones now!